date:Aug 08, 2012
omments on Smirnoff's Australia's Facebook page from today are pictured below) the complainants wrote, adding that a recent Australian Federal Court decision supported their view.
InAustralian Competition and Consumer Commission v. Allergy Pathway(2011) the court ruled that health company Allergy Pathway was responsible for third-party Facebook and Twitter comments in its favor, in defiance of a court order that the firm could not make misleading product claims.
In response, Smirnoff said its