Revised green tea health claim another ‘value laden subjective judgment’ from FDA
date:May 08, 2012
USA that the revised claim was not much better than the old one.


He added: The FDA has once again violated its First Amendment obligation. It is using a forbidden qualitative qualifier: very little scientific evidence.



Under the First Amendment, the fact that the science is inconclusive may be required but not the value laden subjective judgment that very little science supports the claim. Experts disagree with FDA's biased view. Moreover, as ANH v. Sebelius taught, the qualification may no
4/8 next page prev page home page last page
go back |  refresh |  WAP home |  Web page version  | login
12/29 19:51